Quote:
Originally Posted by xian  I think the transcripts would be good source of evidence. The particular section you're relying on not so much.
well, like I said, the transcript section you posted seems very weak evidence at best
if you have a transcript section where he appears to ask about an upcoming question and the transcript doesn't illustrate any earlier discussion of the topic or telegraphing of it.... then I'd be much more inclined to change my mind.
As for non-denial. Some things are better off responded to with a headshake and look of contempt at the accuser. This, imo, is one of them. |
It is beyond me that you can say the transcripts show absolutely no evidence. I guess McCain would have needed to full on state that he knew what the question was before hand for you to even consider it.
Again, how do you explain him answering questions that had not been asked? Can you please provide an answer beyond you thinking it is weak. Why you think it is weak ect...
We both know that no amount of evidence is going to detach you from McCain's man-tit, so please feel free to go find (and ignore) the other parts of the transcript for yourself.