View Single Post
Old 06-03-09, 03:35 PM   #11 (permalink)
-m-
 
-m-'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 16,681
-m- is still bootleg
Re: Dick Cheney's revisionist history, chapter 39

Quote:
Originally Posted by zerojunkie View Post
It seems they've been pretty careful to preface any claims that Saddam was involved with 9/11 specifically, as allegations. What I see a lot of people doing is confusing the more substantiated claim that Saddam and AQ were linked through Sudan, etc. with the claim that Saddam was involved with 9/11. Just saying, they seem to make the differentiation every time I've heard them.
I don't think Cheney or anyone else who has made that statement has been clear enough in making that distinction though. I saw a lot of sense in Cheney's speech, oddly enough, but even from closely listening I got the initial impression that he was still connecting 9/11 to Saddam. I would respect them even more if they just admitted that after the attacks and six years of Saddam taunting the UN investigators they made a call, and it was a blunder.
__________________
Quote:
After extensive research, scientists unanimously agree: the most unsanitary surface in the world is the inside of a magician's sleeve.
http://soundcloud.com/rig-vader
-m- is offline   Reply With Quote