Quote:
Originally Posted by zerojunkie  They sort of had to, which is why chief justice Robert's agreed with Ginsberg's statement of them being damned if they do damned if they don't. I don't know if it was covered in the thread you're referencing, but there's a four-fifths rule that states if the pass rate of a minority is less than 80% than that of white test takers the test is flawed. |
That wasn't covered and that is news to me. Duly noted.
Quote:
Originally Posted by PETA Title VII was also in play. Imo, this case is a great example of the stupidity of trying to mandate an outcome to have a specific racial representation. |
I can kinda see that.
Quote:
Originally Posted by PETA Racially disparate results resulting from a non-discriminatory process is not racial discrimination. One must show more than all black test takers failed. They'd need to show discriminatory intent. |
Gonna take some of this stuff and try to create an exchange of sorts. Nothing violent or label-bringing, just to see what they say in response to these responses.