Dallas Dance Music - Dallas nightlife, music, tickets, and more

Go Back   Dallas Dance Music - Dallas nightlife, music, tickets, and more > The Main Room > Awareness & Politics
Connect with Facebook

Awareness & Politics Constructive discussion only. No flaming, no bashing.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-26-04, 05:03 PM   #1 (permalink)
Foolish Bastard
 
question's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Downtown
Posts: 5,321
question is bootleg
Secret FBI Documents Reveal Kerry Accepted Laundered Contributions

taken from > Judicial Watch <

Secret FBI Documents Reveal Kerry Accepted Laundered Contributions

Senator Also May Have Set Up Meetings Between Chinese Firms, U.S. Officials


(WASHINGTON, D.C.) Judicial Watch, the public interest group that investigates and prosecutes government corruption, today released recently declassified documents showing that Democratic presidential nominee Sen. John Kerry accepted laundered contributions for his 1996 re-election campaign from the Communist Chinese government and that, in exchange, he may have arranged meetings between Chinese aerospace executives and U.S. government officials.

Obtained from the FBI through Freedom of Information Act and Privacy Act requests, the documents are related to the FBI’s “Chinagate” investigation into the Clinton campaign’s acceptance of contributions from Communist Chinese government sources. Among the documents released is an investigative outline dated March 27, 1998, that details the FBI’s “proposed areas of inquiry” into the actions of Democratic fund-raiser Johnny Chung, including questioning him about meetings Sen. Kerry set up with China Aerospace executives and about a fund-raising event for the senator in Los Angeles. The other document, dated Aug. 24, 1998, requests a polygraph of Chung, mentioning that he laundered contributions for the Clinton/Gore ’96 election campaign and for Sen. Kerry. The documents are heavily redacted, and Judicial Watch is appealing the FBI’s decision to keep secret portions of the documents.

Chung pled guilty in March 1998 to election law violations and, in a plea bargain, began cooperating with the FBI. Judicial Watch represents Chung in a lawsuit against Justice Department officials who, during the Clinton administration, leaked information about Chung’s cooperation with the department’s Campaign Finance Task Force. The unauthorized and illegal release from a sealed plea agreement of information, including the fact that he and his family were in protective custody in California, put the lives of Chung and his family in jeopardy.

“These disturbing FBI documents raise further questions about Sen. Kerry’s involvement in what looks like a quid pro quo (cash for meetings) with the Communist Chinese,” said Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton.

To view the documents see the links below (Adobe Acrobat Reader Required):

> document 1 <

> document 2 <
__________________
True, without falsehood, certain and most true, that which is above is the same as that which is below, and that which is below is the same as that which is above, for the performance of miracles of the One Thing. And as all things are from the One, by the meditation of One, so all things have their birth from this One Thing by adaptation.
question is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 08-26-04, 05:26 PM   #2 (permalink)
DirtyEpic
Guest
 
DirtyEpic's Avatar
 
Posts: n/a
126456798761349841
 
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 08-26-04, 05:28 PM   #3 (permalink)
 
proghouse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Harpua
Posts: 698
proghouse is bootleg
What will Bush's staff think of next
proghouse is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 08-27-04, 11:24 AM   #4 (permalink)
 
transparentaura's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 494
transparentaura is bootleg
Since the charge being made is fairly serious, I thought it warranted checking out the source. On the surface this article has all the identifying marks of another right wing hatchett job. The title, "Kerry accepted laundered contributions" implies that he personally accepted laundered money. For example Bush claims he had no knowledge of his campaign staff members working for the swift boat group, which is somewhat believable since a candidate can't possibly keep track of every member of his organization, however it is implied here that Kerry must have been personnally performing the job of treasurer of his own campaign. The story offers no further information on how these funds were "laundered" or the amount. The Chinese are repeatedly referred to as Communist Chinese as if that is an official name. Of course China has a communist govt.,but generally most respected journalists simply use the name of a nation and its people without tacking on descriptors. The tactic of constantly repeating a negative term in the same sentence as the opponents name is an old campaign tactic, again, not generally employed by respected journalists.The story further states “These disturbing FBI documents raise further questions about Sen. Kerry’s involvement in what looks like a quid pro quo (cash for meetings) with the Communist Chinese,” said Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton. Quite possible, however this unsavory little practice is usually described by both parties as "access" for "contributors". The story states that Kerry set up meetings between Government officials and Chinese aerospace execs. I'm not sure why this would suprise anyone. The US has long been trying to work with the Chinese to open their markets for trade,US officials meeting with Chinese execs is not an unheard of event. This again is phrased in a way that gives it a sinister cast, almost like Kerry was selling aerospace secrets. There isn't a whole lot to this story, it's obvious campaign spin. This is too bad, since Judicial watch, long dismissed as partisan muscle backed by Richard Mellon Scaife, has by all accounts been gaining credibility for its claims of non-partisanship by taking on Cheney's secret energy policy panel. But this piece is just one more example that the right's message consists of misleading
accusations repeated ad nauseum until people start to believe it. They have not yet abandoned the playbook of the late Lee Atwater (may he roast in peace)
__________________
Those who can make you believe absurdities, can make you commit atrocities.
-Voltaire
transparentaura is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 08-27-04, 12:50 PM   #5 (permalink)
 
proghouse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Harpua
Posts: 698
proghouse is bootleg
Quote:
Originally Posted by transparentaura
Since the charge being made is fairly serious, I thought it warranted checking out the source. On the surface this article has all the identifying marks of another right wing hatchett job. The title, "Kerry accepted laundered contributions" implies that he personally accepted laundered money. For example Bush claims he had no knowledge of his campaign staff members working for the swift boat group, which is somewhat believable since a candidate can't possibly keep track of every member of his organization, however it is implied here that Kerry must have been personnally performing the job of treasurer of his own campaign. The story offers no further information on how these funds were "laundered" or the amount. The Chinese are repeatedly referred to as Communist Chinese as if that is an official name. Of course China has a communist govt.,but generally most respected journalists simply use the name of a nation and its people without tacking on descriptors. The tactic of constantly repeating a negative term in the same sentence as the opponents name is an old campaign tactic, again, not generally employed by respected journalists.The story further states “These disturbing FBI documents raise further questions about Sen. Kerry’s involvement in what looks like a quid pro quo (cash for meetings) with the Communist Chinese,” said Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton. Quite possible, however this unsavory little practice is usually described by both parties as "access" for "contributors". The story states that Kerry set up meetings between Government officials and Chinese aerospace execs. I'm not sure why this would suprise anyone. The US has long been trying to work with the Chinese to open their markets for trade,US officials meeting with Chinese execs is not an unheard of event. This again is phrased in a way that gives it a sinister cast, almost like Kerry was selling aerospace secrets. There isn't a whole lot to this story, it's obvious campaign spin. This is too bad, since Judicial watch, long dismissed as partisan muscle backed by Richard Mellon Scaife, has by all accounts been gaining credibility for its claims of non-partisanship by taking on Cheney's secret energy policy panel. But this piece is just one more example that the right's message consists of misleading
accusations repeated ad nauseum until people start to believe it. They have not yet abandoned the playbook of the late Lee Atwater (may he roast in peace)
= What will Bush's staff think of next

Bush will use any tactic, even lying, to gain what he wants.
proghouse is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 08-27-04, 12:53 PM   #6 (permalink)
 
Ryan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 3,783
Ryan is bootleg
I heard John Kerry eats babies too. It was on Newsmax.
Ryan is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:33 PM.


Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.3.2
no new posts

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16