If you had your way...

[Dionysos]

...assuming you had the ability to change up to 2 members of this administration, which would you change? For the sake of clarity, let's go from before the election so we don't have to deal with those who have already resigned or the new appointees. I'm looking to see which people in the administration you feel are the most detrimental to America. On the converse side, for those that are behind the Bush admin., if you could keep up to 2 members which would you keep? Which do you feel have been the most beneficial to this country?

I'll go first.

The 2 I would boot:
1) Rumsfeld: Abu Gharaib stands out as the biggest issue, but his overall willingness to bend/twist facts and the lack of accountability he has in this administration make him #1 on my list.

2) Wolfowitz: Any man that believes Mylroie's theory about TWA flight 800 and refuses to understand the insubstantial relation between Iraq and 9/11 in the face of larger threats needs to go.


The 2 I would keep:
1) Bush: I believe he honestly wants to help the country, and I think he might act differently if given the correct information. I don't think he's out to deceive us, but his only sources of information are pulling his strings in the wrong direction.

2) Greenspan: I know he's not technically part of the administration, but I believe his fiscal policies could save this country and put it into an unprecedented state of well-being if his advice was followed. He's the only major figure to speak out for serious Social Security reform, and his control of the interest rates has helped stall a recession and warm a recession into a recovery. Between him and Warren Buffet, I think they could turn this country's deficit into an obscene surplus if they were given carte blanche.

</.02>

[Kill -9]

Originally Posted by Dionysos

...assuming you had the ability to change up to 2 members of this administration, which would you change? For the sake of clarity, let's go from before the election so we don't have to deal with those who have already resigned or the new appointees. I'm looking to see which people in the administration you feel are the most detrimental to America. On the converse side, for those that are behind the Bush admin., if you could keep up to 2 members which would you keep? Which do you feel have been the most beneficial to this country?

I'll go first.



The 2 I would keep:
1) Bush: I believe he honestly wants to help the country, and I think he might act differently if given the correct information. I don't think he's out to deceive us, but his only sources of information are pulling his strings in the wrong direction.

bwahahahaha thats the funniest thing i have read yet today! The "man" can not even give a public speech without reading it off of a piece of paper or note cards.

[Taki]

I would change #1 and #2.