tight change? Video animation using photo evidence to debunk missile/pentagon claim

[Dionysos]

Take it for what it's worth.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YVDdjLQkUV8&eurl=

[zerojunkie]

nice find.

[Nyteshade]

Oh but it's obviously right wing propaganda designed to hide the truth. An administration that can't even keep a few surveillance(sp?) programs secret put together an operation utilizing aircraft to kill thousands of people in a fake terrorist attack. Jeez, thought you knew.

[Deff Gordon]

lol

somebody had to spell out common sense.

[Satchel]

Next up, Daffy Duck will show us the Saddam-9/11 connection

[e-brake]

My big issue with this video is the use of Solid Works to do the 3d and animation work. I use solidworks every day and I know for a fact that it was not designed to make aminations of that type. I know from personal experiance that solidworks animations are more often than not critically flawed and inacurate and have no real world limitations and can be adjusted to give you jsut about any results you want to achieve.

not to mention the actual scale of the objects in the video seems to be inacurate and poorly constructed. Someone that knows how to use solidworks professionally would have produced a much better representation than that, it looked like the result of a solidworks 101 class project.

[Satchel]

Can you make one showing G Dub blowing up the pentagon Wil E Coyote style?

[e-brake]

Originally Posted by Satchel

Can you make one showing G Dub blowing up the pentagon Wil E Coyote style?

sure, but for some odd reason my boss wants me to do actual "work" here and its cramps my free time for fun projects. If I get bored this weekend I jsut might pop one out for the fun of it tho.

[Satchel]

the man, always keepin a brother down

[Rufus Punk]

Originally Posted by Satchel

Next up, Daffy Duck will show us the Saddam-9/11 connection

@W(TY@J#)NP*)N@#Y+_@(NJTM)_GY!!!

It hurts to laugh that hard.

[zerojunkie]

Originally Posted by e-brake

My big issue with this video is the use of Solid Works to do the 3d and animation work. I use solidworks every day and I know for a fact that it was not designed to make aminations of that type. I know from personal experiance that solidworks animations are more often than not critically flawed and inacurate and have no real world limitations and can be adjusted to give you jsut about any results you want to achieve.

not to mention the actual scale of the objects in the video seems to be inacurate and poorly constructed. Someone that knows how to use solidworks professionally would have produced a much better representation than that, it looked like the result of a solidworks 101 class project.

True but, scale aside, everything up until the actual impact was supported by physical evidence (light poles, generator, and to a lesser extent the security camera footage). It was just nice to see it all pieced together in an animation. Hell the first picture it shows, the one with the first light pole flight 77 hit in the foreground and the pentagon in the background, is pretty damn good evidence against a missile attack or a car bomb.

[e-brake]

Originally Posted by zerojunkie

True but, scale aside, everything up until the actual impact was supported by physical evidence (light poles, generator, and to a lesser extent the security camera footage). It was just nice to see it all pieced together in an animation. Hell the first picture it shows, the one with the first light pole flight 77 hit in the foreground and the pentagon in the background, is pretty damn good evidence against a missile attack or a car bomb.

I believe that a plane did hit the building, I just think that this video wasnt very professionally done. The seciruty camera footage was interesting tho.

[JoshM]

It helps visually to debunk the missle theories (tho i never thought those were even relevant) I just want to know why the hotel and gas station security tapes were confiscated.

[Deff Gordon]

Originally Posted by JoshM

I just want to know why the hotel and gas station security tapes were confiscated.

who said they were? the flash animation saying it was a missile?

[shonuf]

Originally Posted by zerojunkie

True but, scale aside, everything up until the actual impact was supported by physical evidence (light poles, generator, and to a lesser extent the security camera footage). It was just nice to see it all pieced together in an animation. Hell the first picture it shows, the one with the first light pole flight 77 hit in the foreground and the pentagon in the background, is pretty damn good evidence against a missile attack or a car bomb.

yes the evidence.

for example, radio towers on tops of tall buildings have beacons so planes dont hit them.

because it would rip the wing off the plane, just like those light poles should of done.

you guys are that dumb?


second of all, the video does not show what happened to the wings, their video shows the wings going in the building fully extended???????????

um is that the new line?


if so, where was the holes the wings and engines made?

hello mcfly, shit still dont fit.