Man in charge of counting 81% of NH votes is felon with cocaine & election fraud past

[e-brake]

Allegations of vote fraud in New Hampshire’s primary are growing. In what was advertised as a fair and open election in the Live Free or Die state, it appears that concerns of the fraud and data manipulation are viable.
The data from Diebold Accuvote optical scanner electronic voting machines is up to 5% points different than the hand-written ballots that were cast. Sutton Town has now reported an error in transposing votes and an employee of LHS Associates, whom counted 81% of the vote, has a criminal record.
Township clerk Jennifer Call of Sutton, New Hampshire has confirmed that ‘31′ votes were in fact cast for Ron Paul in Sutton when ‘0′ votes were initially reported. They claim that it was an error in transposing the data during transfer to the summary sheet. These 31 residents from Sutton can rest assured that their votes are NOW being counted. But what about the rest of the townships?
The results from the Diebold machines, easily hacked in the HBO documentary Hacking Democracy, don’t add up. They claim that Ron Paul had over 2% fewer votes than the hand ballots suggest, and gave Giuliani a .5% boost for 4th place instead. The same ballot machines also show that Hillary faired 5% better than with the hand ballots, taking 1st away from Obama. See this site for more detailed analysis.
In another developing story, Bev Harris of Black Box Voting.org has confirmed that a key employee of LHS Associates, John Elder is a convicted felon with cocaine trafficking charges and election fraud related complaints. LHS Associates holds the contract for programming all of the New Hampshire’s Diebold voting machines, which combined count 81 per cent of the vote.
“They are counting everything in public real nice, they fill out a form in public real nice and then they transfer it to another form and they call that a summary sheet and then that is the one they send in,” explained Harris.
Bev Harris said in reference to the Sutton fiasco:
“What happened is she said they did not transfer the number correctly and put zero instead of 31 - that is unacceptable as an answer.”
The cost of a hand re-count is estimated at $67,000. It is not known at this time whether the Paul or Obama campaigns will consider a re-count.



http://truthseeds.org/2008/01/09/err...bama-and-paul/

[reason]

niiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiice

[Sinner]

Hillary - 2
Obama - 0
?????????


Any other links to back this up? I didn't see any from my quick google search.

[e-brake]

Originally Posted by MicahB

Hillary - 2
Obama - 0
?????????


Any other links to back this up? I didn't see any from my quick google search.

http://www.blackboxvoting.org/ has a good system for tracking all the stories and assorted links. You can find quite a few from various sources to read.

[umalak_]

Yeah, but c'mon... caucuses and primaries don't mean anything. Just ask xian.

[Sinner]

I still don't see where it says that Hillary overtook Obama.

Seems like something that big would be on yahoo, cnn, print newspapers....

[umalak_]

c'mon Micah, the media is in on it! it's a conspiracy!

I always take these articles with a massive grain of salt. If all of this were true, don't you think the candidates themselves would be all over it like white on rice? Even if you don't trust the media to report this sort of thing, surely the candidates would be taking a long, hard look at these accusations. You think Hillary would let her loss in Iowa slide that easily?

[johnny861]

Originally Posted by TragicallyUnhip

I always take these articles with a massive grain of salt. If all of this were true, don't you think the candidates themselves would be all over it like white on rice? Even if you don't trust the media to report this sort of thing, surely the candidates would be taking a long, hard look at these accusations. You think Hillary would let her loss in Iowa slide that easily?

That depends. If you are the winning candidate and you voice your concerns over potential fraud, that might make you look favorable.

If you are the losing candidates and you voice your concerns over fraud? People might mistake that for you pandering for a recount because you lost.

You gotta play the mob, so I don't think they will say much unless directly asked about it and then they'll rattle off some generalized rhetoric.

[Sinner]

Originally Posted by umalak_

c'mon Micah, the media is in on it! it's a conspiracy!

[e-brake]

Originally Posted by TragicallyUnhip

I always take these articles with a massive grain of salt. If all of this were true, don't you think the candidates themselves would be all over it like white on rice? Even if you don't trust the media to report this sort of thing, surely the candidates would be taking a long, hard look at these accusations. You think Hillary would let her loss in Iowa slide that easily?

Thats the general argument that I hear when I tell people about this. They just refuse to believe that its possible, and refuse to believe that the politicians would stand back and allow it to happen. This usually leads me to ask, if its not true and it doesnt happen then why are there 4 people sitting in federal prisons right now for doing it in the 2004 presidential election. Why are there an additional two people convicted of rigging the recount.

These arent acusations, these are people who were caught red handed, confessed and are now sitting in prison.

If it doesnt happen how do you explain Alan Raymonds book "HOW TO RIG AN ELECTION" that he wrote while serving time for a GOP phone jamming conviction during the 2002 NH primary under the direct guidence of Karl Rove?

oh and here is a video of Computer Programmer Clint Curtis testifying under oath that Tom Feeney (Speaker of the Houe of Florida at the time, currently US Representative) tried to pay him to rig election vote counts in 2004.

Rigged USA Elections Exposed

Close

You need to upgrade your Flash Player

[Sinner]

I don't doubt your last post.


I just doubt your first one.



Hillary would be going after Obama if that were true. No doubt in my mind.