state considers drug tests for welfare recipients

[2dj's1cup]

http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories...MPLATE=DEFAULT

States consider drug tests for welfare recipients
By TOM BREEN
Associated Press Writer



CHARLESTON, W.Va. (AP) -- Want government assistance? Just say no to drugs.
Lawmakers in at least eight states want recipients of food stamps, unemployment benefits or welfare to submit to random drug testing.
The effort comes as more Americans turn to these safety nets to ride out the recession. Poverty and civil liberties advocates fear the strategy could backfire, discouraging some people from seeking financial aid and making already desperate situations worse.
Those in favor of the drug tests say they are motivated out of a concern for their constituents' health and ability to put themselves on more solid financial footing once the economy rebounds. But proponents concede they also want to send a message: you don't get something for nothing.
"Nobody's being forced into these assistance programs," said Craig Blair, a Republican in the West Virginia Legislature who has created a Web site - notwithmytaxdollars.com - that bears a bobble-headed likeness of himself advocating this position. "If so many jobs require random drug tests these days, why not these benefits?"
Blair is proposing the most comprehensive measure in the country, as it would apply to anyone applying for food stamps, unemployment compensation or the federal programs usually known as "welfare": Temporary Assistance for Needy Families and Women, Infants and Children.
Lawmakers in other states are offering similar, but more modest proposals.
On Wednesday, the Kansas House of Representatives approved a measure mandating drug testing for the 14,000 or so people getting cash assistance from the state, which now goes before the state senate. In February, the Oklahoma Senate unanimously passed a measure that would require drug testing as a condition of receiving TANF benefits, and similar bills have been introduced in Missouri and Hawaii. A Florida senator has proposed a bill linking unemployment compensation to drug testing, and a member of Minnesota's House of Representatives has a bill requiring drug tests of people who get public assistance under a state program there.
A January attempt in the Arizona Senate to establish such a law failed.
In the past, such efforts have been stymied by legal and cost concerns, said Christine Nelson, a program manager with the National Conference of State Legislatures. But states' bigger fiscal crises, and the surging demand for public assistance, could change that.
"It's an example of where you could cut costs at the expense of a segment of society that's least able to defend themselves," said Frank Crabtree, executive director of the West Virginia chapter of the American Civil Liberties Union.
Drug testing is not the only restriction envisioned for people receiving public assistance: a bill in the Tennessee Legislature would cap lottery winnings for recipients at $600.
There seems to be no coordinated move around the country to push these bills, and similar proposals have arisen periodically since federal welfare reform in the 1990s. But the appearance of a cluster of such proposals in the midst of the recession shows lawmakers are newly engaged about who is getting public assistance.
Particularly troubling to some policy analysts is the drive to drug test people collecting unemployment insurance, whose numbers nationwide now exceed 5.4 million, the highest total on records dating back to 1967.
"It doesn't seem like the kind of thing to bring up during a recession," said Ron Haskins, a senior fellow at the Brookings Institution. "People who are unemployed, who have lost their job, that's a sympathetic group. Americans are tuned into that, because they're worried they'll be next."
Indeed, these proposals are coming at a time when more Americans find themselves in need of public assistance.
Although the number of TANF recipients has stayed relatively stable at 3.8 million in the last year, claims for unemployment benefits and food stamps have soared.
In December, more than 31.7 million Americans were receiving food stamp benefits, compared with 27.5 million the year before.
The link between public assistance and drug testing stems from the Congressional overhaul of welfare in the 1990s, which allowed states to implement drug testing as a condition of receiving help.
But a federal court struck down a Michigan law that would have allowed for "random, suspicionless" testing, saying it violated the 4th Amendment's protections against unreasonable search and seizure, said Liz Schott, a senior fellow at the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities.
At least six states - Indiana, Massachusetts, Minnesota, New Jersey, Wisconsin and Virginia - tie eligibility for some public assistance to drug testing for convicted felons or parolees, according to the NCSL.
Nelson said programs that screen welfare applicants by assigning them to case workers for interviews have shown some success without the need for drug tests. These alternative measures offer treatment, but can also threaten future benefits if drug problems persist, she said.
They also cost less than the $400 or so needed for tests that can catch a sufficient range of illegal drugs, and rule out false positive results with a follow-up test, she said.
---
Associated Press Writer Lawrence Messina in Charleston contributed to this report.
(This version CORRECTS spelling of Virginia sted Viginia.)
© 2009 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed. Learn more about our Privacy Policy




******
part of me agrees, cause if they have money for drugs they have money for food. but most parents are likely to say fuck it and not get welfare and the kids end up suffering, but then again assuming just because someone on welfare is a drug user is fucked up. I guess im on the fence on this one

[elNastioBananaHando]

That would be awesome!

[2dj's1cup]

oops this was intended for A&P

[PETA]

I suppose if they can tell businesses to breach contracts in exchange for $$ they can tell other people that they can't break the law and get $$

[Hubb]

im all about it. Bring that shit on.

[ONE FM]

Good call..

[Cock Puncher]

Originally Posted by Mr. Awesomepants

oops this was intended for A&P

fixed

[C-fer]

About time. I mentioned this a while back.
Great idea!!

[bryAnt]

We should just do them one better and throw anyone who tests positive in jail for fraud. Who do these drug users think they are? Stealing from the American Government should be a crime, whether it's food, controlled rent, unemployment, or any other type of hand out. All they do is reproduce, eat, and consume drugs. Fuck them for not being able to feed their families. Fuck them for having families.

[Sinner]

yeah, I'm all for that as well.


no problem w/ anyone raving it up, but not while using tax payers money to live.

[DJMishap]

GOOD!

Ive been waiting for this

[Ash]

i've been saying they should do this for quite some time.

[emphatic_apparatek]

Fuck that.. Im currently on food stamps. Just because I like to smoke every now and then, and don't spend money on it, doesnt mean I shouldnt get food stamps. That's a bunch of bullshit. Im glad oregon doesn't have anything like that.

[PETA]

Originally Posted by emphatic_apparatek

Fuck that.. Im currently on food stamps. Just because I like to smoke every now and then, and don't spend money on it, doesnt mean I shouldnt get food stamps. That's a bunch of bullshit. Im glad oregon doesn't have anything like that.

Do you think the AIG execs should give their bonuses back?

You accepted tax dollars. The gov't can place restrictions on them. I don't think this is an unreasonable restriction.

[Tyler Durden]

that's racism.